Why Reboots and Identity Politics are Signaling the End of Main Stream Entertainment

A generic photo of actress Francesca, looking directly at the camera with a happy expression, set against a simple, unadorned backdrop.

Overview of Why Hollywood is Failing

Hollywood’s decline can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the industry’s overemphasis on politics has overshadowed the art of storytelling. Instead of focusing on engaging narratives, many films and TV shows push political agendas, alienating a significant portion of the audience who may not share the same views. This relentless pursuit of political relevance often comes at the cost of quality storytelling, resulting in lackluster content that fails to captivate audiences.

Furthermore, the implementation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices has sometimes resulted in individuals being placed in positions they are not qualified for. In an attempt to promote diversity, the industry has made hires based on factors such as gender or ethnicity rather than merit. As a consequence, the quality of storytelling may suffer when individuals lacking the necessary experience or talent take on key roles. This can lead to a sense of dissatisfaction among viewers.

It is worth noting that the majority of DEI hires are women who tend to lean towards producing content that caters primarily to women or minority audiences. While this is an important step towards inclusivity, it can inadvertently create a divide as the content may fail to resonate with a broader demographic. Consequently, when men do not show up, there is often criticism, but the blame lies with the lack of content diversity rather than the viewers themselves.

Lastly, Hollywood’s reliance on reboots and lack of originality contribute to its decline. Audiences crave fresh and innovative storytelling, yet the industry seems stuck in a cycle of remaking old classics or relying heavily on established franchises. This lack of creativity and risk-taking diminishes audience interest and reinforces the perception that Hollywood lacks original ideas.

Constant Reboots of Old Movies No One Wants Rebooted

In recent years, the entertainment industry has been plagued by a constant stream of reboots and remakes. While there are certainly instances where a revival can captivate audiences and breathe new life into a beloved story, many of these endeavors have fallen flat. Here are a few examples of remakes that failed to resonate with audiences and the reasons behind their lack of success.

One reboot that quickly comes to mind is the 2016 reboot of “Ghostbusters.” Despite having a talented cast, the film received backlash from fans who believed that the original should have been left alone. The decision to gender-swap the main characters felt forced to some, and the movie struggled to find its own identity amidst comparisons to the original. Additionally, the humor and charm that made the first film a classic seemed to be lost in this modern adaptation.

Another example is the 2017 remake of “The Mummy.” This film attempted to launch Universal’s Dark Universe, a cinematic universe featuring classic monsters. However, audiences were largely uninterested in this reimagining. The film suffered from convoluted storytelling and a lackluster script, failing to capture the spirit of the original and ultimately leading to the collapse of Universal’s plans for their Dark Universe franchise.

The common thread among these failed reboots is the failure to understand what made the originals so beloved in the first place. People often feel a strong connection to the nostalgia and magic of the original films, and a remake needs to offer something new and impactful while honoring the source material. When these elements are mishandled, the audience feels disenchanted and disinterested, resulting in the general apathy towards constant reboots of old movies that no one wants rebooted.

Movies are More Costly vs Their Value in a Tough Economy

In a tough economy, finding cost-effective forms of entertainment becomes essential for many individuals. When it comes to movies, the cost and inconvenience of going to the theater versus streaming services present a compelling argument for the latter.

Firstly, let’s consider the cost. Going to the movies involves several expenses. Ticket prices have steadily increased over the years, and in some cases, they can be quite steep, particularly for blockbuster films or those shown in IMAX or 3D formats. Additionally, theaters often charge exorbitant amounts for concessions, leading to an overall expensive outing.

Conversely, streaming services offer a more affordable alternative. Monthly subscription fees are generally reasonable, with a plethora of content available at a fraction of the cost of a movie ticket. Furthermore, many platforms offer family or group plans, making it even more economical for households.

Moreover, the inconvenience actually travelling to the movies cannot be overlooked. Theater schedules may not always align with one’s availability, and the hassle of commuting, finding parking, and queuing are often time-consuming. In contrast, streaming services provide on-demand access to a vast library of movies and TV shows, allowing viewers to watch whenever and wherever they prefer.

In conclusion, movies can be costly and inconvenient when compared to the convenience and affordability of streaming services, especially in a challenging economic climate. By opting for streaming, individuals can enjoy a wide range of content at a fraction of the price, and on their own terms.

Weaponizing a Political Agenda Instead of Delivering Entertainment

It is indeed true that movies have a political undertone, reflecting the beliefs and values of their creators. However, it becomes problematic when filmmakers start weaponizing these political agendas instead of focusing on delivering quality entertainment.

In recent years, there has been a noticeable trend where certain movies portray men, especially those with white skin, as villains or inherently flawed individuals. This one-sided representation comes across as lecturing and alienating to a large segment of the audience. It is not surprising that some demographics feel discouraged from watching these movies as they are made to feel unwelcome or villainized based solely on their gender or skin color.

One could argue that these movies intentionally provoke such reactions in order to generate controversy on social media. By capitalizing on the division and polarizing discussions, filmmakers hope to garner attention and create hype around their projects. However, this strategizing comes at the expense of genuine storytelling and entertainment value.

While it is the right of filmmakers to convey their political messages through movies, it is counterproductive to complain when these targeted demographics refuse to support such films. Rather than engaging audiences on a meaningful level and encouraging open dialogue, these movies often amplify existing social divides.

In conclusion, it is essential for filmmakers to strike a balance between advocating for their political beliefs and delivering engaging entertainment. Weaponizing a political agenda can undermine the very purpose of movies and detract from the overall viewing experience. By focusing on authentic storytelling and fostering inclusivity, movies can transcend their political biases and truly connect with a wide range of audiences.

Romeo and Juliet Remake is a Great Example of Failing Entertainment

The controversy surrounding the stage production remake of Romeo and Juliet is centered on the casting of a black woman as Juliet. However, it is important to note that the issue at hand is not related to race, but rather the perception of her unconventional attractiveness. Critics argue that a conventionally unattractive black woman was chosen to play the role in order to manufacture accusations of racism.

Adding fuel to the fire, the story is expected to explore the issue of racism between Juliet’s black family and Romeo’s white family. This revision is seen by many as an unnecessary addition, falling into the realm of identity politics and diverting attention from the true essence of the original play.

Additionally, in a world where love is scarce and relations between men and women are strained, the timing for a love story seems ill-fated. The demand for such a narrative is arguably low, further contributing to the skepticism surrounding this film.

Given these factors, it appears that the Romeo and Juliet remake is setting itself up for failure. Whether it’s the controversies surrounding the casting choices or the untimely release, the play seems ill-equipped to succeed in today’s competitive climate.

Hollywood’s Failure is Opportunity for Indepedent Creators

Instead of force-feeding generic stories and predictable plots, Hollywood has struggled to connect with its audience on a personal level. This lack of understanding has pushed people to seek alternative sources of entertainment, such as YouTube and other online platforms. These platforms, in contrast, offer tailored content that resonates with their users, acknowledging their unique preferences and perspectives.

What makes independent content creators stand out is their ability to adapt quickly. If their content fails to captivate the audience, they can swiftly move on to the next endeavor, learning from their mistakes and engaging in a constant feedback loop. Hollywood, on the other hand, often invests huge sums of money in a single project, necessitating its persistence even in the face of negative feedback.

As Hollywood struggles amidst its competitive marketplace, independent creators have the opportunity to shine. With lower production costs and the ability to target niche audiences, these creators can bypass the traditional barriers of entry into the film industry. Armed with their passion and creativity, they can challenge the dominance of the big players and offer refreshing and innovative content to a hungry audience.

In conclusion, Hollywood’s failure in understanding its audience has become a golden opportunity for independent content creators to showcase their talents. As people turn to platforms like YouTube for tailored content, the significance of understanding the audience cannot be overstated. With the ability to adapt quickly and target niche audiences, independent creators can revolutionize the film industry and compete with the established giants. The era of Hollywood’s monopoly is fading, making way for a new wave of creativity and diversity.

Leave a Reply

By connecting to The MisoGenius™, you are agreeing to the Terms of Use and confirming you understand the Privacy Policy.